<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Richard's Linux and E-learning blog - Latest Comments in 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:28:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-8350158</link><description>Good post. This will help the people to do to do ethical and provide the quality in the task. Really good job.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seo Services India</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 12:28:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-8093726</link><description>Your suggestions here are all very good. In fact, they are critical, not just to get better page ranking, but also to avoid being penalized by Google. I have seen many sites go from #1 spot to the hundredth page of results simply because they have duplicate content. Or because of keyword stuffing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SEO NYC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-6738639</link><description>yes .. i agree with you.. &lt;br&gt;black seo = kill self :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zulva</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:44:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-6669624</link><description>These are some of the most common mistakes or blunders small businesses make when attempting SEO.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">search_engine_optimization</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-6633180</link><description>Are now in the indonesian 2 SEO contest organized by using keywords &lt;a title="tukang nggame" href="http://blackinews.blogspot.com/2009/02/tukang-nggame.html" rel="dofollow" alt="tukang nggame" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tukang Nggame&lt;/a&gt;. and kampanye damai pemilu indonesia 2009.&lt;br&gt;No Rules, the only one to be the only rule. Please understand that any action &lt;a title="tukang nggame" href="http://blackinews.blogspot.com/2009/02/tukang-nggame.html" rel="dofollow" alt="tukang nggame" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tukang Nggame&lt;/a&gt;. do is appropriate, consistent with the corridor rule itself. Whitehat, blackhat, greyhat, everything is allowed to participate in the &lt;a title="tukang nggame" href="http://blackinews.blogspot.com/2009/02/kelebihan-seo-kontes-no-rule.html" rel="dofollow" alt="tukang nggame" rel="nofollow"&gt;Games&lt;/a&gt; during the SEO Contest.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">blackidea</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-6462480</link><description>I agree with you, It may quickly raise SERP and PR but sooner or later they will be penalized with google..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Traffic Geyser</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:56:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-6299290</link><description>you are on my rss reader now</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">abts0203ac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-5867143</link><description>Great list!!! Really don't do those things!!! Keep it white hat (A)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Q5 Webdesign</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-5770001</link><description>Refreshing to note to find this article about some terrible SEO ideas. At least site owners will be warned as to what SEO tips are over-rated and what tips just dont work. And thanks for adding resources on what we can do if we are really using those tips.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chaunna Brooke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:03:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-5521687</link><description>Well done Richard,  A great article for people looking to otpimise there site. Sadly I have even seen reputable firms using some of the above pratices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With regards to duplicate content, check out &lt;a href="http://www.ragepank.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.ragepank.com&lt;/a&gt;. I use Joomla quite a lot and find that I have to alter the htaccess a lot to stop the 200 (ok) from appearing many times. (This should only appear once per page).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Optimization Sheffield</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:22:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-5391022</link><description>Thank for that definition, tht good knowledge.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">beloed</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:39:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-5383959</link><description>many people do link farming but it still boost their SERPs, what do yo think about that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">belajarseo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-4812417</link><description>keyword stuffing is okay as long as you never pass 8%. cmiiw.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rahach</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:01:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-4725604</link><description>Great reminder on what not to do when it comes to SEO. I agree that useless content is out of the question as there is no long term return to gain from it therefore making the invested effort all go to waste.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BusbySEOTesting</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:16:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-4431192</link><description>NEGATIVE FAVOURITISM FTL ;(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ninjaaaaaaaaa</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-4021066</link><description>nice post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seo things</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:47:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-3285154</link><description>Blackhat techniques will definitely cause alot more harm than anything,</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ctaborda</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:37:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-3021278</link><description>That's a good list Richard. It's a sad state of affairs that lots of SEOers are still makign these mistakes and clients are still paying there poor practices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Thompson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:15:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-3008141</link><description>Nice list, straight forward but true. Good advice for beginners.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-3006413</link><description>Good list. Pretty standard though, heard them before.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thomas Eilander</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-2998654</link><description>Such a great idea about this, it  helps me a lot to know more the modern way of handling seo specially those websites which got hard time to find relevant references, but it's a big challenge to create and make your own.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philfreelance-web</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:52:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-2997665</link><description>Thump Black Cat SEOing. It won't work</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chirag Pinjar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:42:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-2997576</link><description>Good tips, be sure not to link to junky or spammy sites from yours as well. Google doesn't penalize if they link to you(since there's nothing you can do about it if they do), but linking to them is your choice and can harm your reputation</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beecher Bowers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:26:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 terrible SEO ideas</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/10/10/5-terrible-seo-ideas/#comment-2997407</link><description>Good list. Often people don't realize the unethical nature of some of these practices. Thanks for sounding the warning!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandonacox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:58:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>