<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Interesting Things - Latest Comments in Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/benchmarking_chrome8217s_v8_javascript_engine/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:16:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/benchmarking-chromes-v8-javascript-engine/#comment-8005156</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love Firefox =)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Learn Forex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/benchmarking-chromes-v8-javascript-engine/#comment-4584866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I also like the Chrome layout. The only dilemma I have is that it shuts down on certain sites. And now it is not running with the internet. So I stick with good old Firefox. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Forex</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:23:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/benchmarking-chromes-v8-javascript-engine/#comment-2820641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like Google Chrome But I can not get my talking Buddy to work with the chrome it works fine on iGoogle with the ie8 but not by its self,the same thing with all of my MS Characters they will not work with the Google Chrome,I will keep the chrome any way,I am using seven browsers on this computer so I do have a good option. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Forex Day Trading</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/benchmarking-chromes-v8-javascript-engine/#comment-2180859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, I was surprised too, and have run them with various different combinations. FF 3.1 has both the JIT options in about:config set to true and I restarted the machine. On these benchmarks it actually performs slightly slower than when they are set to false...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Weird - I'm going to update to the newest nightly today and try again, these benchmarks are with yesterdays nightly build.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:09:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/benchmarking-chromes-v8-javascript-engine/#comment-2150437</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure there's something wrong here...&lt;br&gt;Firefox 3.0 and Firefox 3.1 perform almost identically, but it is known that 3.1 is orders of magnitude faster than 3.0 because of its new tracing capabilities (hence its name "Tracemonkey").&lt;br&gt;Is there any chance that these benchmarks were done with FF 3.0 JIT disabled?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:42:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>